Page 244 - Read Online
P. 244

Page 6 of 9                                                     Gitto et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:22  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2019.50


               Table 1. Available meta-analyses analyzing the possible association between DAA therapy and HCC
               Ref.          Year  Country N of studies N of patients  Increased risk of occurrence  Increased risk of recurrence
               Waziry et al. [22]    2017  Australia  41  13,875  DAA comparable to IFN  DAA comparable to IFN
               Saraiya et al. [21]     2018  USA  24  1820     /                      DAA comparable to IFN
               Singh et al. [23]    2018  USA  44    39,145    no conclusive data     no conclusive data
               Rutledge et al. [24]    2019  USA  138  177,512  DAA comparable to IFN  DAA comparable to IFN

               DAA: direct-acting antiviral; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; IFN: interferon

               Regarding the possible relationship between metabolic disorders and risk of HCC in the specific setting
               of DAA therapy, Nahon et al.  reported interesting results. These authors retrospectively analyzed data
                                         [37]
               from 1270 cirrhotic patients comparing the incidence of HCC in patients treated with IFN-based protocols
               or DAA therapy. First of all, authors demonstrated that patients treated with DAA were older and had
               higher rates of diabetes, suggesting that these patterns might explain the reported higher percentages of
               HCC occurrence in this subgroup of patients in comparison with the IFN group. However, the authors
               conducted a multivariate analysis, demonstrating that DAA therapy itself did not emerge as a predictor
               of HCC occurrence. Other factors such as increased age, past excessive alcohol consumption, virological
               parameters [genotype 1 (in contrast with previously reported data)], decreased platelet count and increased
               gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels were independently associated with post-treatment HCC onset.
               Concerning the metabolic issue, neither diabetes nor obesity was directly associated with HCC occurrence,
                                                                          [38]
                                                                                                       [39]
               but it is well known that GGT increase is a sign of altered metabolism  or higher inflammatory activity .
               In fact, elevated GGT activity is coupled with traditional cardiovascular risk factors and particularly with
               metabolic syndrome .
                                [38]

               CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
               DAAs have constituted an extraordinary breakthrough in the therapy of hepatitis C. With an 8- to 12-week
               course of treatment, SVR occurs in more than 95%-99% of patients, depending on degree of liver fibrosis.
               These results were beyond any reasonable expectation until a few years ago. It is therefore quite conceivable
               that the report of an increased occurrence or recurrence of HCC during or shortly after stopping DAAs
               initiated a series of reactions of concern. With more data accumulating, it is now clear that there is no
               such risk on a population basis. In fact, as summarized in Table 1, the available high-quality meta-analyses
               categorically demonstrated that the risk of both HCC recurrence and occurrence after SVR is comparable
               between patients treated with “old” IFN-based protocols and new DAAs. As recently stated by the American
               Association for the Study of Liver Diseases , SVR due to DAAs determine a decrease in all-cause mortality,
                                                   [40]
               cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and HCC, an improvement in extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV, and
               an amelioration of both productivity and quality of life. Summarizing, we must treat with DAA all patients
               without history of HCC and all subjects with complete response to HCC treatment. Notably, as strongly
               demonstrated in a recently published meta-analysis , patients with HCC show, for unknown reasons, lower
                                                          [41]
               pooled SVR rate in comparison with subjects without cancer (88.2% vs. 92.4%).

               Although DAAs represent a great therapeutic option, it is possible that some subgroups of subjects may be
               at increased risk of HCC onset after DAA treatment. In fact, on an individual basis, administration of DAAs
               might be associated with facilitated HCC development in subjects who already have a predisposing hepatic
               condition, namely activated neoangiogenesis, as shown by increased levels of angiopoietin-2 in cirrhotic
                    [29]
               tissue . In these patients, a careful evaluation of risk-benefit of DAA treatment should be done, also in
                                                              [29]
               view of the aggressive features of DAA-associated HCC . Finally, in the long-term management of HCV-
               positive patients, it has to be considered that subjects with severe metabolic impairment seem to maintain a
                                                                           [37]
               significant risk of HCC despite antiviral treatment and viral eradication .
               Concerning the possible identification of subpopulations at higher risk of HCC, some authors have analyzed
               the change in inflammatory balance due to DAAs as a determinant of cancer development [19,42] .
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249