Page 45 - Read Online
P. 45

Hewitt et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:75     https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.83                                                                                         Page 9 of 19



                          Table 1. Randomized clinical trials of chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer

                                          Takada et al. [125]                                          PRODIGE12/ACCORD18                   BILCAP                                       BCAT
                          Study arms      5FU + mitomycin vs. observation                              GEMOX vs. observation                Capecitabine vs. observation                 Gemcitabine vs. observation

                          Recruitment     April 1986-June 1992                                         July 2009-February 2014              March 2006-December 2017                     September 2007-January 2011
                          period
                          Total sample    436                                                          196                                  447                                          225
                          size

                          Disease         CCA 118 (27%)                                                ICCA 86 (44%)                        ICCA 84 (19%)                                PCCA 101
                          distribution    PDAC 158 (36%)                                               PCCA 15 (8%)                         PCCA 128 (28%)                               DCCA 124
                                          GBC 112 (26%)                                                DCCA 55 (28%)                        DCCA 156 (35%)
                                          Ampulla 48 (11%)                                             GBC 38 (20%)                         GBC 79 (18%)
                          Primary         OS                                                           RFS and time to definitive deterioration  OS                                      OS
                          endpoints                                                                    of HRQOL

                          Secondary       DFS, ECOG PS, improvement in body weight, adverse events     OS, toxicity, and exploratory        Per-protocol analysis of OS/RFS, RFS, toxicity,   RFS and toxicity
                          endpoints                                                                    translational endpoint               health economics, and quality of life

                          Completion of   80% completion                                               Median of 10 cycles of 10 for        55% completed chemotherapy, 10 patients (4%)  52.1% completed chemotherapy
                          therapy                                                                      gemcitabine and oxaliplatin          had 0 cycles, 32% discontinued therapy due to
                                                                                                                                            toxicity                                     18 patients stopped Gem due to
                                                                                                                                                                                         needing tor dose reduction
                          Results         5-year OS improved in patients with GBC who received adjuvant   No difference in OS, RFS, or      No significant difference in OS in intention to treat  Gemcitabine provided no
                                          therapy (26.0% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.0367) and 5 year DFS (20.3% vs.   deterioration of HRQOL          population                                   difference in OS or RFS
                                          11.6%, P = 0.0210)                                                                                Significant improvement with capecitabine in OS
                                          No difference in OS or DFS in patients with PDAC, CCA, or                                         and RFS in prespecified per-protocol analysis
                                          ampullary cancer
                          Relapse rate    79.9% adjuvant therapy                                       62.1% adjuvant therapy               60% adjuvant therapy                         53.8% adjuvant therapy
                                          88.4% observation                                            67.7% observation                    65% observation                              56.5% observation

                          GBC: Gallbladder cancer; CCA: cholangiocarcinoma; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; ECC: extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; ICC: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 5FU: 5-fluorouracil; OS: overall survival;
                          DFS: disease-free survival; RFS: recurrence-free survival; ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; HRQOL: health-related quality of life; ICCA: intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma; PCC:
                          peripheral cholangiocarcinoma; DCCA: distal cholangiocarcinoma; GEMOX: gemcitabine oxaliplatin; BACT: bile duct adjuvant cancer trial.



                          primary endpoint was OS with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival, tumor response, and adverse events. Of the 410 patients randomized, 149
                          patients had gallbladder cancer, 241 had cholangiocarcinoma, and 20 had ampullary cancer; 204 received cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and 206 received

                          gemcitabine alone.



                          At a median follow-up of 8.2 months, the median OS was significantly higher in patients who received cisplatin-gemcitabine than the gemcitabine alone (11.7
                          months vs. 8.1 months; hazard ratio = 0.64; 95%CI: 0.52-0.80; P < 0.001). Additionally, patients who received cisplatin-gemcitabine had improved PFS (8.0
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50