Page 144 - Read Online
P. 144

Wong et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:45  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.28  Page 7 of 11

               Table 3. Pathological characteristics
                                             Open resection (n = 92)  Laparoscopic resection (n = 46)  P
                Size of tumour, cm           4 (1-14)                3.3 (1.2-7)                    0.003
                Number of tumour nodule                                                             0.106
                  1                          78 (84.8%)              42 (91.3%)
                  2                          7 (7.6%)                3 (6.5%)
                  3                          2 (2.2%)                1 (2.2%)
                  Multiple                   5 (5.4%)                0
                Tumour pattern (solitary: multiple)  78:14           42:4                           0.284
                Site (unilobar:bilobar)      83:9                    43:3                           0.751
                With macrovascular invasion  4 (4.3%)                0                              0.301
                With microvascular invasion  35 (38%)                18 (39.1%)                     0.902
                Nontumorous liver                                                                   0.801
                  Noncirrhotic               32 (34.8%)              17 (37%)
                  Cirrhotic                  60 (65.2%)              29 (63%)
                Resection margin                                                                    1.000
                  Not involved               91 (98.9%)              46 (100%)
                  Involved                   1 (1.1%)                0
                UICC7                                                                               0.163
                  Stage I                    46 (50%)                25 (54.3%)
                  Stage II                   32 (34.8%)              18 (39.1%)
                  Stage IIIA                 4 (4.3%)                2 (4.3%)
                  Stage IIIB                 4 (4.3%)                0
                  Stage IIIC                 6 (6.5%)                1 (2.2%)
                New Edmonson grading                                                                0.72
                  Well-differentiated        14 (15.2%)              6 (13%)
                  Moderately differentiated  58 (63%)                33 (71.7%)
                  Poorly differentiated      18 (19.6%)              6 (13%)
                  Necrosis                   0 (0%)                  1 (2.2%)
                  Not available              1 (1.1%)                0 (0%)



               laparoscopic device and high-definition laparoscopy with magnified view are key factors in the laparoscopic
               approach that facilitates transection in a cirrhotic liver .
                                                             [10]

               An  important  concern  for  use  of  laparoscopy  in  elderly  patients  is  the  creation  of  the  CO
                                                                                                         2
               pneumoperitoneum, with the potential of impairing ventilation in patients with diminished reserve and/or
               occult chronic lung diseases [22,29,30] . It is worthwhile to note that our study found a trend of fewer
               cardiopulmonary complications in the laparoscopic group. The benefit of avoiding a subcostal, muscle
               cutting incision likely outweigh its potential adverse effect of transient diaphragmatic splintage during the
               intra-operative period.


               Both the laparoscopic and the open group had similar cancer staging and Edmondson grading on final
               pathological examination after propensity score matching. Although there is a statistically significant
               differences in the tumour size between the groups, clinically, the median tumour size of the laparoscopic
               and the open group differed only by 0.7 cm which was unlikely to cause significant impact to patient’s
               selection and prognosis. The laparoscopic group showed better disease-free survival and a trend for better
               overall survival, which is similar to findings in the younger patients. Less blood loss and fewer
               intraoperative manipulation of tumour associated with laparoscopic resection may be attributable to a better
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149