Page 138 - Read Online
P. 138

Wong et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:45                              Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2021.28



               Original Article                                                              Open Access



               Defining the role of laparoscopic liver resection in

               elderly HCC patients: a propensity score matched
               analysis


                                   #
                                               #
               Phoenix Wai Yan Wong , Ka Wing Ma , Tan To Cheung, Wong Hoi She, Wing Chiu Dai, Albert Chi Yan
               Chan, Kenneth Siu Ho Chok, Chung Mau Lo
               Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
               #
                Authors contributed equally.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Tan To Cheung, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong,
               Room 340, Block L, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: cheung68@hku.hk

               How to cite this article: Wong PWY, Ma KW, Cheung TT, She WH, Dai WC, Chan ACY, Chok KSH, Lo CM. Defining the role of
               laparoscopic liver resection in elderly HCC patients: a propensity score matched analysis. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:45.
               https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2021.28
               Received: 1 Mar 2021  First Decision: 22 Apr 2021  Revised: 5 May2021  Accepted: 21 May 2021  First online: 24 May 2021

               Academic Editor: Ho-Seong Han  Copy Editor: Xi-Jun Chen  Production Editor: Xi-Jun Chen


               Abstract
               Aim: To elucidate the role and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection for elderly patients with hepatocellular
               carcinoma (HCC).

               Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis was performed between laparoscopic and open liver resection
               operated from year 2008 to 2018. Consecutive HCC patients aged 65 or above at the time of operation were
               recruited. Patients with recurrent HCC and/or alternative pathology were excluded. Short-term and long-term
               outcomes between the laparoscopic and the open group were compared. Propensity score matching of patients in
               a ratio of 1:2 was conducted before comparison.
               Results: A total of 911 patients underwent hepatectomy for primary HCC from 2008 to 2018. Among them, 320
               elderly patients aged over 65 years old were eligible for analysis. Heterogeneities between laparoscopic and open
               groups were identified namely pre-operative albumin level, aspartate transaminase, and magnitude of hepatectomy
               (major vs. minor). After propensity score matching of 1:2, 46 patients in the laparoscopic group and 92 patients in
               the open group were included for comparison. The laparoscopic group had less blood loss (326 mL vs. 735 mL; P <
               0.001), shorter operative time (223 min vs. 324 min; P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (6.3 days vs. 10.5 days; P
               < 0.001). No significant differences in postoperative morbidity and hospital mortality were noted between the
               groups. For oncological outcome, the laparoscopic group had a superior disease-free survival (59.7% vs. 44.5%; P




                           © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                             www.hrjournal.net
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143