Page 62 - Read Online
P. 62

Yamaguchi et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:50  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.68                                      Page 7 of 10

               Table 2. Cumulative survival rates (%) of hepatocellular carcinoma patients in Japan [61]  treated with hepatic resection
                                                                       Cumulative survival rates (%)
                Years                          Number
                                                            1          3          5        7        10
                Tumor number        1           16,531     93.7       80.8       67.0     54.7     39.0
                                    2           3494       90.0       71.0       54.8     40.4     27.2
                                    ≥ 3         2717       81.1       55.8       37.9     28.1     20.4
                Portal vein invasion  Vp0       19,075     94.4       80.5       65.5     52.4     36.8
                                    Vp1         1908       84.9       62.4       48.2     39.0     28.9
                                    Vp2         714        69.1       42.2       29.2     22.5     17.3
                                    ≥ Vp3       852        59.8       34.3       25.0     20.5     15.6
                TNM stage by LCSGJ  I           2339       97.8       90.0       74.3     61.4     42.5
                                    II          9755       94.1       78.0       62.5     50.1     35.5
                                    III         3902       85.6       61.8       43.5     33.5     23.3
                                    IVA         1208       69.4       38.9       25.9     20.3     15.4
                                    IVB         2118       56.5       28.0       18.7     14.5     14.5
               LCSGJ: Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Mainly edited the manuscript: Yamaguchi S, Kosaka T
               Qualified the manuscript: Eguchi S
               Read and approved the manuscript: Yamaguchi S, Kosaka T, Eguchi S


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.



               REFERENCES
               1.   Kudo M, Matsui O, Izumi N, Iijima H, Kadoya M, Imai Y, Okusaka T, Miyayama S, Tsuchiya K, Ueshima K, Hiraoka A, Ikeda M,
                   Ogasawara S, Yamashita T, Minami T, Yamakado K; Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. JSH consensus-based clinical practice
                   guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2014 update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Liver Cancer
                   2014;3:458-68.
               2.   European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical
                   practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:908-43.
               3.   Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br
                   J Surg 1973;60:646-9.
               4.   Takada Y, Ito T, Ueda M, Sakamoto S, Haga H, Maetani Y, Ogawa K, OguraY, Oike F, Egawa H, Uemoto S. Living donor liver
                   transplantation for patients with HCC exceeding the Milan criteria: a proposal of expanded criteria. Dig Dis 2007;25:299-302.
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67