Page 109 - Read Online
P. 109

Kornberg et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:60                           Hepatoma Research
               DOI: 10.20517/2394-5079.2018.86


               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma -
               non-cancer factors and implications for improving
               outcome beyond standard tumor criteria


               Arno Kornberg, Martina Schernhammer

               Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich D-81675, Germany.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Arno Kornberg, Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich D-81675,
               Germany. E-mails: ArnoKornberg@aol.com

               How to cite this article: Kornberg A, Schernhammer M. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - non-cancer factors and
               implications for improving outcome beyond standard tumor criteria. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:60.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.86
               Received: 6 Jul 2018    First Decision: 16 Aug 2018    Revised: 27 Aug 2018    Accepted: 28 Aug 2018    Published: 29 Sep 2018

               Science Editor: Guang-Wen Cao    Copy Editor: Yuan-Li Wang    Production Editor: Zhong-Yu Guo



               Abstract
               Liver transplantation (LT) is recognized as best treatment option in patients with early hepatocellular cancer
               (HCC) in underlying liver cirrhosis. Apart from tumor size and number implemented in the Milan criteria, which
               are current worldwide standards for patient selection, several biological tumor factors have been identified to
               affect cancer-specific outcome. In particular, grading and vascular tumor invasions were shown to correlate with
               aggressive biological tumor behavior and poor survival following LT. Identifying tumors with favorable biology
               is one important approach for expanding the pool of eligible liver recipients beyond the Milan burden limits.
               Improving the immunological state and condition for appropriate defense against circulating cancer cell attack
               may be another important prognostic aspect. Therefore, there is increasing interest in non-cancer factors related
               to the peritransplant period that may influence the oncological outcome by providing negative immunomodulatory
               actions. Considering and modulation of these non-HCC factors of prognosis might contribute in safely expanding
               the HCC LT selection criteria.

               Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, tumor biology, non-cancer factors, outcome




               INTRODUCTION
               In the last 40 years, liver transplantation (LT) has developed as a generally accepted standard procedure in the
               treatment of a wide range of end-stage liver diseases. Especially liver replacement for hepatocellular carcinoma
                                                                                                        [1]
               (HCC) in underlying liver cirrhosis became a phenomenal story of clinical success in oncological surgery .


                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                    www.hrjournal.net
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114