Page 128 - Read Online
P. 128

Lee et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:52  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.42                                                 Page 3 of 11

                                                   [20]
                                                                                                    [21]
               overexpress at least one FGF and/or FGFR . The main FGFRs expressed in liver tissue are FGFR3  and
                     [22]
               FGFR4 .
               Whilst healthy hepatocytes express minimal levels of FGF1 or FGF2, these levels increase when there is cir-
               rhosis and increasing levels correlate with the progression of cirrhosis into HCC. Higher levels of FGF1 and
                                                           [23]
               FGF2 are also seen in more advanced tumour stages . There is hence interest in using FGF1 and FGF2 ex-
                                               [24]
               pression levels as a prognostic marker , though its utility as a diagnostic marker or for follow-up of HCC
                                                [25]
               patients is limited by its non-specificity .
                                                                                             [26]
               In preclinical models, FGF1 and FGF2 were shown to stimulate proliferation of HCC cell lines  through the
                                                                                                [27]
               activation of tumour invasion and angiogenesis resulting in an increase in capillarised sinusoids . There is
               however substantial redundancy in FGF1- and FGF2-mediated signaling, suggesting that direct targeting of
                                                          [28]
               these ligands may have limited therapeutic efficacy .
               The FGF8 subfamily, comprising FGFs 8, 17 and 18, also promotes oncogenesis through stimulating hepato-
               cyte proliferation. At least one member of the FGF8 subfamily or its corresponding receptors FGFR2, FGFR3
                                                             [20]
               and FGFR4 is upregulated in more than 50% of HCCs . The use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) target-
                                                                                  [20]
               ing FGF18 has been shown to reduce the viability and proliferation of HCC cells .
               The FGF19 subfamily, comprising FGFs 19, 21 and 23, act as endocrine factors mediating metabolic effects
               through FGFR signaling. FGF19, which comes mainly from the ileum, plays a role in the physiological regu-
               lation of bile acid and cholesterol metabolism as well as insulin sensitivity. FGF19 binds exclusively to FGFR4
               with the co-receptor β-Klotho (KLB) stabilising the interaction. FGF19/FGFR4 signaling is thought to be of
                                                           [29]
               particular importance in the carcinogenesis of HCC , with FGF19 expression increased, through focal am-
                                                               [30]
               plification of 11q, in approximately 6%-12% of HCC cases . FGFR4 expression is also upregulated in almost
                          [31]
               half of HCCs . In addition, FGF19 levels may be prognostic, with higher expression in resected HCC speci-
                                                                                                       [32]
               mens being associated with larger tumour size and stage and higher risk of recurrence after hepatectomy .
                                                                      [29]
                                                                                            [33]
               In vitro studies show that FGF19 induces HCC cell proliferation  and inhibits apoptosis . Mice models
               also confirm that the ectopic expression of FGF19 promotes hepatocyte proliferation, dysplastic change and
                                            [34]
               precipitates the formation of HCC . Similarly, FGFR4 knockout mice showed increased hepatocyte injury
                                                                    [35]
               when challenged with the hepato-toxin carbon tetrachloride . Targeting the FGF19/FGFR4 interaction
               through various approaches appears to be effective in  inhibiting hepatocarcinogenesis and HCC growth
                                                                                         [36]
               in preclinical models, be it through the use of a neutralizing antibody against FGF19 , through genetic
                                           [33]
                         [30]
               knockdown , or though siRNA . Using siRNA to knockdown FGFR4 also showed similar results in mice
                                                                                             [37]
               models, which had impaired regeneration and increased liver injury after partial hepatectomy .
               As previously mentioned, the FGF/FGFR pathway has been shown to be upregulated after initial blockade of
                                   [38]
               the anti-VEGF pathway , and may be an important resistance mechanism to anti-VEGF therapy including
               that of sorafenib. For a long time, sorafenib was the only systemic treatment option for advanced HCC, hav-
               ing demonstrated an improvement in overall survival of 2-3 months in two large phase III trials [39,40] . Whilst
               having inhibitory effects on multiple targets including VEGFR, PDGFR and Raf kinases, sorafenib has no
                               [41]
               anti-FGFR activity . Concomitant dual blockade of FGF/FGFR and VEGF pathways are hence a potentially
                                                                  [38]
               attractive approach in the efforts to overcome this resistance .

               OVERVIEW OF FGF/FGFR PATHWAY INHIBITORS AND THEIR TOXICITIES
               Current available inhibitors against the FGF/FGFR pathway can be classified into Figure 1: (1) monoclonal
               antibodies which competitively inhibit FGF binding to the FGFR extracellular domain; (2) FGF-ligand traps;
               and (3) small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (FGFR TKIs).
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133