Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Ruff et al. Hepatoma Res 2023;9:37  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2023.51  Page 3 of 10

                                                                                          [18]
               ECCA  [11,16,17] . IDH1 is found in the cytosol, while IDH2 is found in the mitochondria . In physiologic
               conditions, IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes participate in a two-step reaction in the Krebs cycle that converts
               isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). In the first part of the reaction, isocitrate is converted through
               oxidation to oxalosuccinate. Subsequently, the beta-carbonyl group on oxalosuccinate is released as CO2 to
               form α-KG. This reaction also results in the reduction of two NADP  molecules to NADPH [19,20]  [Figure 1].
                                                                         +
               This reduction supports the scavenging of reactive oxygen species and cholesterol biosynthesis.
               Additionally, α-KG acts as a co-substrate for many enzymes. When cells are exposed to hypoxia, IDH1 and
               IDH2 can reverse the reaction and convert α-KG back to isocitrate and replenish the Krebs cycle or generate
               acetyl-CoA .
                         [15]

               Role of IDH mutations in ICCA
               Most commonly, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are secondary to a point mutation in the R132 and R172
               codons, respectively . The pathways for how mutated IDH leads to oncogenesis are still poorly
                                 [21]
               understood, but pieces of the puzzle have been elucidated through various studies. There is general
               consensus that the primary oncogenic mechanism of IDH mutations is through an accumulation of 2-
                                      [15]
               hydroxyglutarate (2-HG)  [Figure 1]. Gain of function mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 results in the
               generation of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) and a decrease in α-KG and NADPH. 2-HG is structurally similar
               to α-KG and competitively binds and inhibits dioxygenase enzymes [15,18,20] . These enzymes include regulators
                                               [22]
               of cell differentiation and metabolism . In addition, the decreased levels of α-KG results in the degradation
               of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and increased angiogenesis, while the reduction in NADPH leads to
               an increase in reactive oxygen species [18,22] . Through these various mechanisms, IDH mutations prevent
               hepatic progenitor cell differentiation and result in the persistence of stem and progenitor-like cells. These
                                                                              [15]
               cells are more prone to oncogenic alterations that promote tumor initiation .

               In recent years, the immune tumor microenvironment has emerged as a crucial component of tumor
               development and progression. Some studies have demonstrated that IDH mutations play a role in immune
               modulation of the microenvironment. Studies in gliomas have demonstrated an association between IDH1
               mutations and low intra-tumoral CD8  T cells and immune-related signaling compared to IDH1 wild-type
                                                +
               tumors [23,24] . The increased presence of 2-HG also contributes to immunosuppression within the tumor
               microenvironment. In vitro studies have shown that 2-HG is taken up by T-cells. This leads to inhibition of
               T cell proliferation and reduced production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and IL-2. However, it is poorly
               understood how 2-HG is secreted from tumor cells and then taken up by T cells [15,25] .

               Most pre-clinical studies for IDH mutations employ pre-clinical models for gliomas or acute myeloid
               leukemia. Wu et al. utilized pre-clinical models for cholangiocarcinoma to demonstrate that IDH1
               mutations resulted in immune suppression through a TET2 inactivation. Additionally, they demonstrated
               the efficacy of combination therapy with IDH1 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) . Their
                                                                                                  [26]
               team created a genetically engineered IDH1 mutated murine model that promoted ICCA development.
               Biopsies of the mouse livers showed elevated levels of 2-HG and similar histopathologic features of human
               ICCA. With this model, they found that elevated levels of 2-HG mediated a TET2 inactivation and that
               IDH1 mutations suppressed anti-tumor immunity by causing an insensitivity of ICCA cells to immune
               signals and impairing CD8  T cell function. When an IDH1 inhibitor was employed, the authors saw rapid
                                      +
               CD8  T cell recruitment and decreased tumor growth. Of note, no effect was seen on tumor growth with an
                   +
               IDH1 inhibitor in immunodeficient mice, thereby confirming the necessity of an immune response to
               observe the anti-tumor effect of IDH1 inhibition. RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
               analysis of immunocompetent mice treated with an IDH1 inhibitor showed upregulation of interferon-γ
               response genes and an increase in CD8  T cell infiltration.
                                                +
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78