Page 9 - Read Online
P. 9

Graner. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids 2020;1:3-19  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2020.08                     Page 5

               RFA-OD-20-018, seeking approaches to detect, test, validate, and implement testing for SARS-CoV-2 in the
               COVID-19 pandemic. She ended with a list of exosome/EV-related funding announcements across NIH
               Institutes, and commented on the future of vesicles and exRNA in terms of basic biology and translational
               applications.

               The next 2 sessions focused on exosome/EV cargo loading and cargo unloading. Session Chairs were
               Juan Pablo Tosar (Universidad de la República, Uruguay) and Andrew Leidal (University of California
               San Francisco, US). Alissa Weaver (Vanderbilt University, US) addressed a controversy in the EV field:
               is EV-associated Argonaute an artifact or is it selected cargo? She noted that extracellular RNA in blood
               is prevalent in non-vesicular forms, likely released from necrotic cells, and largely held by RNA-binding
               proteins (RBPs), including Argonaute 2 (AGO2). Vesicular RNA in blood is less abundant, but is a product
               of active secretion. These forms may represent different functional capacities, as well. She noted that different
               cell status (mutations, signaling) result in different RNAs and RBPs that are expressed and localized in cells,
               and differentially segregated into vesicles. She provided compelling evidence that serum (such as fetal bovine
               serum) is a source of non-vesicular AGO2 and microRNAs, which further complicates the assessments
               of AGO2 and miRNAs from cells grown in serum-containing media. Thus, the cell state, mutational and
               signaling status, and growth conditions all contribute to AGO2 and likely, other RBPs, and their bound
               RNAs in terms of vesicular or non-vesicular entities.


               Leonid Margolis (NIH, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, US) followed next
               with a presentation on EV-associated cytokines and their implications for cell-cell communications. This
               topic highlights broad questions of how exosomes and other EVs are addressed to particular cells, and how
               the EV cargo affects recipient cells. EVs may play roles in protecting contents and applying appropriate
               ‘shipping addresses’. Leonid pointed out that cytokines are encapsulated within EVs, and are also present
               on EV surfaces. These operate as systems, and that the cytokine surface vs. lumenal localizations are not
               independent, but reflect changes in parental cell states. Differing soluble vs. cytokine-EV states are evident
               in blood of patients experiencing post-radiation fatigue syndrome and in a form of myocardial infarction,
               among other pathologic settings. EV-associated cytokines appear functional, and have an impact on recipient
               cells due to their selective delivery onto cells with appropriate receptors. Improved understanding of cytokine
               loading and targeting of such EVs could enlighten our concepts of cell-cell communication.

               RNAs of various types are described as exosome/EV cargo, begging questions such as: how the RNAs are
               loaded, are they transferred to recipient cells, and are the RNAs functional in the recipient cells. Olivier
               de Jong (University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands) reported studies in this area that employed
               an innovative CRISPR-Cas9 system, which they called CRISPR operated stoplight system for functional
               intercellular RNA exchange (CROSS-FIRE). It utilizes transfer of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) that are
               capable of driving reporter signals in recipient cells in a non-contact system, thus indicating the loading of
               sgRNA into EVs in donor cells, and functional transfer to recipient cells measured by fluorescent readout.
               This transfer worked with various donor and recipient cell types. The system uncovered genes involved in
               endocytosis, extracellular matrix adhesion, and intracellular membrane trafficking that affected RNA transfer
               via EVs (ITGB1, ROCK1, RAB5, RAB7). For translational development, the system appears more efficient at
               functional RNA transfer than with lipid nanoparticle-based products, suggesting therapeutic uses of mRNA
               or siRNA transfer.

               In a display of EV cargo (or lack thereof) relevant to disease processes, Laura Ferraiuolo (University of
               Sheffield, UK) introduced the neurodegenerative disease amyloid lateral sclerosis (ALS). The most frequent
               mutation in the familial version of ALS (35%) and spontaneous ALS (11%) is in C9ORF72, which can lead to
               several potential (and overlapping) pathological situations. One potential mechanism is that the C9ORF72
               translation product may inappropriately sequester RNAs, thus altering cell function and cell crosstalk.
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14