Page 88 - Read Online
P. 88

Page 12 of 15                      Li et al. Complex Eng Syst 2023;3:1  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ces.2022.46

               Table 2. Compare multiple time scale management
                         Length of time   Advantage                                 Disadvantage
                Long time   One day or more than   Take into account more aspects, and reduce the pressure of real-  Limited time domain selection
                scale    24 h             time adjustment
                Short time   Not sure (hours, minutes) Smaller error, more accurate  Not in time
                scale
                real-time  Within a minute, a few   The response is faster and timelier  The control is complex and error-
                         seconds                                                    prone



               Table 3. The case of current operation
                Country   Harbor          Load                   RES
                                  [40]
                Denmark   Copenhagen      E = 38 MWh/day         PV (200 KW)
                                          P max  = 5.2 MW        WT (4.95 MW)
                               [39]
                Greece    Mytilene        E = 22 MWh/day         PV (5 MW)
                                          P max  = 900 kW        WT (6 MW)
                                 [36]
                USA       Long Beach      E = 150-200 MWh/day    PV, WT
                                          P max  = 140 MW
                                [38]
                Spain     Cartagena       E = 314 MWh/day        PV (until 9.7 MW)
                                          P max  = 13.1 MW       WT (onshore: 36.3 MW; Offshore: 16 MW)
                Singapore  Jurong port    E = 200 MWh/day        PV, WT

               Company affiliated with the Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, jointly developed, constructed
               and operated the world’s first offshore floating photovoltaic power station (Bellini,8.5 kW modular PV
               system). It has been in operation since November 2019 and has successfully withstood multiple storms. The
               pilot program aims to expand to 50 KWp in the short term and will be tested for a year . Table 3 shows
                                                                                           [63]
               some existing examples of WT and PV generation at some ports.


               7. CONCLUSIONS
               The development of floating technology and renewable energy generation technology has solved the
               problem of port energy shortage. However, the floating technology is greatly affected by wind and waves,
               and the floating power generation platform only stays near the port. Port load capacity is large, and energy
               management is complex. Flotsam and energy management strategies suitable for ports are being explored.
               Future renewable energy generation at ports will involve deep sea areas, and thus the use of offshore wind
               power and energy management will need to be more coordinated. This paper reviews the current utilization
               of renewable energy and intelligent control strategies of smart seaports. In the future, efficient control
               strategies of smart seaports will be used to improve energy conversion efficiency and build clean ports.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               Special thanks to the Intelligent Electrical Science and Technology Research Institute, Northeastern
               University (China), for providing technical support for this research.

               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study: Li G, Wang T, Zhou B
               Provided administrative, technical, and material support: Xiao Z, Yan S, Liu B


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93