Owing to their favorable safety profile, economic viability, and reduced environmental impact, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) are suited for large-scale energy storage and could complement existing lithium-ion battery technologies^[1,2]. Studies have demonstrated that interfacial engineering plays a crucial role in enhancing the performance of Zn-based energy storage systems, including alkaline Zn-air batteries^[3-5]. Nevertheless, the interfacial challenges in AZIBs differ substantially because they involve Zn deposition/stripping in ZnSO₄-based electrolytes, which are accompanied by dendrite growth and parasitic side reactions^[6,7]. To address interfacial issues, researchers have recently proposed various strategies to regulate metal-ion deposition behavior and interfacial reaction kinetics, including catalytic interfacial engineering^[8-11], electrolyte optimization^[12,13], interface engineering and electrode structure design^[14-17]. Recent studies have demonstrated that catalytic interfacial engineering can accelerate Zn²⁺ desolvation, lower the nucleation barrier, and regulate Zn deposition kinetics^[10,18]. Alongside catalytic interface design, electrolyte engineering has also emerged as an effective approach for tailoring the Zn anode/electrolyte interface and suppressing parasitic side reactions. For example, Na^+[19], Mg^2+[20], and Y^3+[21] ions were introduced into the electrolytes. Due to their adsorption on the Zn anode surface, the craze growth of Zn dendrites was inhibited by the formation of shielding layers. However, owing to the irreversible depletion of the inorganic salt additive, the prolonged cycling performance of AZIBs needs to be further demonstrated.

Organic molecule additives, encompassing both small molecules and polymers (e.g., esters, nitriles, amines), have received considerable research attention^[22-24]. This is primarily attributed to the ability of heteroatom-based functional groups (e.g., -S-, -N-, C=O, and C=N) to coordinate with Zn²⁺ ions via their lone electron pairs, thereby modulating the solvation of the Zn²⁺ ions^[25]. Besides, introducing organic additives into the electrolyte can lower the activity of H₂O molecules and hinder their redox reactions due to the strong binding to H₂O molecules^[26]. It has been reported that short-chain alcohols, such as ethanol and erythritol, can penetrate the Zn²⁺ solvation sheath via interactions with coordinated H₂O, altering the primary solvation structure of Zn^2+[27]. Ether additives have been shown to form a shielding layer at the Zn protrusion tip, thereby directing Zn²⁺ deposition into adjacent depressions and yielding a smoother zinc deposit morphology^[28]. Moreover, extending the carbon chain length and increasing the number of functional groups within the additive molecules reinforce the hydrogen-bonding network with H₂O, thereby suppressing undesirable side reactions. However, the incorporation of organic additives is not without drawbacks, as it may compromise the electrolyte’s ionic conductivity and potentially impair battery safety. Therefore, a judicious balance between the type and concentration of additives is essential to achieve optimal electrochemical performance.

As a result, trace-based organic molecular additives have received attention^[29-32]. For instance, Yu et al. introduced trace amounts of hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) as additives into the electrolyte of AZIBs. The HMTA additives can preferentially adsorb onto the Zn anode surface, creating a unique anode-molecule interface^[29]. On the other hand, organic molecular additives based on bifunctional groups have been investigated^[6,33]. For example, Li et al. reported the use of 4-amino-benzene-sulfonic acid (ABSA) additives in the ZnSO₄ electrolyte to improve the performance of AZIBs^[6]. They observed that ABSA forms an adsorption layer on the Zn anode surface, thereby facilitating the formation of a stable, sulfur-rich solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). In addition, organic molecules containing both sulfonic acid groups and hydroxyl or carbonyl groups have attracted considerable attention owing to their bifunctional characteristics^[26,34]. Sun et al. proposed a chemical self-deoxygenation strategy involving the addition of sodium anthraquinone-2-sulfonate into the electrolyte, which effectively mitigates the performance degradation of AZIBs induced by dissolved oxygen^[35]. However, the underlying mechanism by which the functional groups of organic additives regulate Zn deposition and stripping remains to be fully elucidated.

On this basis, alizarin red S (ARS) organic molecules bearing sulfonic acid, hydroxyl, and carbonyl groups were selected as electrolyte additives in this work. Their interactions with both the Zn anode interface and the electrolyte bulk were investigated. Comparative investigations were carried out on sodium p-hydroxybenzenesulfonate (PHS), which contains both hydroxyl and sulfonic groups, and sodium benzenesulfonate (SBS), which contains only a sulfonic group. Although similar multifunctional organic additives have been studied for Zn anode stabilization through Zn²⁺ coordination^[36], preferential adsorption^[6], and solvation regulation^[34], relatively little attention has been paid to exploiting organic molecules with extended π-conjugated frameworks to regulate the interfacial electron distribution. Results show that, with the synergistic effect of the extended π-conjugated framework and multiple functional groups, ARS molecules can adsorb onto the Zn anode surface, homogenizing the local interfacial electron density and achieving uniform Zn deposition. Meanwhile, the C=O groups in ARS can accept protons, mitigating local pH fluctuations and effectively suppressing the accumulation of parasitic products. In addition, the electrochemical reduction of ARS generates a dense inorganic-rich SEI in situ at the Zn/electrolyte interface. Such an interfacial layer homogenizes Zn²⁺ flux and improves the reversibility of Zn deposition/dissolution. Benefiting from these effects, symmetric Zn//Zn cells containing ARS sustain prolonged operation beyond 2,700 h (1 mA cm^-2, 0.5 mAh cm^-2) and 2,000 h (2 mA cm^-2, 1 mAh cm^-2), exceeding those cells using ZnSO₄, ZnSO₄ + PHS, and ZnSO₄ + SBS electrolytes. Zn//I₂ batteries using the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte also deliver superior cycling stability and rate performance compared with those using the ZnSO₄ electrolyte. This work provides new insights into the design of high-performance AZIBs through the use of multifunctional additive molecules.

The three organic molecules differ in their functional groups: ARS contains -SO₃^-, -OH, and -C=O groups; PHS contains -SO₃^- and -OH groups; and SBS contains only -SO₃^- group [Figure 1A]. Among them, ARS possesses an extended π-conjugated framework, PHS features a combination of intra-ring π-conjugation and p-π conjugation, whereas SBS is limited to intra-ring π-conjugation. Therefore, the electron regulation capability of the three molecules follows the order: ARS > PHS > SBS, attributed to the dimensionality of their π-conjugation systems. As a result, these molecules exhibit distinct effects on the Zn²⁺ solvation sheath, Zn²⁺ coordination environment, and hydrogen-bonding network within the electrolyte. As shown in Supplementary Figures 2-4, UV-Vis spectra of ARS-, PHS-, and SBS-containing ZnSO₄ electrolytes exhibit progressively intensified absorption bands with increasing additive concentration, indicating the increasing population of electronically active species in the electrolyte. Notably, the absorption band centered at ~525 nm is significantly enhanced in the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte [Figure 1B and Supplementary Figure 2]. This band is associated with the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) transition within the anthraquinone π-conjugated framework of ARS^[38,39]. The enhanced visible-light absorption suggests strengthened π-electron delocalization and electronic redistribution of ARS molecules induced by Zn²⁺ interaction. In Figure 1B, the absorption band at ~262 nm related to the π → π* transition of the anthraquinone conjugate exhibits an obvious red shift^[40,41], which further indicates that the electron transition energy within the ARS framework is reduced and the π-electron delocalization is enhanced. Such electronically reconstructed ARS species possess an enhanced electron redistribution capability, enabling a more homogeneous interfacial electron distribution on the Zn surface, and thereby promoting uniform Zn deposition^[42].

NMR, FTIR, and Raman techniques were combined to investigate the Zn²⁺ solvation structure and hydrogen-bonding network of electrolytes. As shown in Figure 1C, a significant chemical shift of ¹H appears after introducing ARS, PHS, and SBS into ZnSO₄ solutions, indicating the formation of a new hydrogen-bonding network. Compared with the ZnSO₄ solutions, the ¹H NMR signals of water molecules in ZnSO₄ + ARS and ARS solutions show a significant chemical shift toward a higher field, indicating an increased electron density around the proton nuclei and an enhanced shielding effect arising from the interaction between ARS molecules and H₂O^[43]. Figure 1D and Supplementary Figure 5 show Raman and FTIR spectra of ZnSO₄ with different additives. In comparison with the pure ZnSO₄ solution, the proportion of strong hydrogen bonding decreased, whereas that of the medium hydrogen bonding increased in the solution containing ARS, PHS, and SBS [Figure 1E and Supplementary Figure 6]. In contrast, the proportion of weak hydrogen bonding remained nearly unchanged, with values of approximately 6%~7%. Among the tested solutions, the ARS solution exhibited the lowest proportion of strong hydrogen bonding (58.6%) and the highest proportion of medium hydrogen bonding (34.4%). These results indicate that ARS, PHS, and SBS additives perturb the original hydrogen-bonding network^[44]. This modification of the deposition environment may suppress both the Zn dendritic growth and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).

DFT calculations were performed to investigate the interactions of different molecules. The binding energies of ARS, PHS, SBS, and H₂O molecules are all lower than the binding energy between H₂O molecules [Figure 1F], suggesting that they can affect the hydrogen-bonding network and possibly also the solvation sheath. Moreover, the binding energies of ARS, PHS, and SBS with Zn²⁺ are lower than those of H₂O, indicating that these molecules can enter the solvation sheath and partially replace the coordinated water molecules [Figure 1G]. However, these additives are used at trace concentrations. Consequently, their impact on the solvation sheath is rather limited in this work^[45].

A combination of theoretical simulations and experimental tests was jointly applied to elucidate how these molecules interact with and regulate the electrode interface. The charge densities calculated by DFT show that the O in H₂O, ARS, PHS, and SBS molecules exhibit significant electronegativity [Supplementary Figure 7], indicating a strong tendency for their adsorption onto the Zn surface^[6]. The electronegative groups in the electrostatic potential diagram confirm the adsorption sites of these molecules on the Zn electrode surface [Supplementary Figure 8]. Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure 9 demonstrate their adsorption energies on the Zn (002) surface in horizontal and vertical configurations. As can be seen, ARS, PHS, and SBS molecules show stronger adsorption than H₂O molecules in both horizontal and vertical orientations on the Zn (002) surface, owing to the rich lone-pair electrons on their O atoms. When adsorbed horizontally on the Zn (002) surface, the adsorption strength follows the order of ARS (-4.38 eV) > PHS (-3.46 eV) > SBS (-3.02 eV). In contrast, the adsorption strength order is reversed for the vertically adsorbed configurations. This difference can be attributed to the extended planar π-conjugated framework of ARS, which provides a larger contact area with the Zn (002) surface in the horizontal adsorption configuration, thereby strengthening van der Waals interactions and π-Zn interactions and resulting in stronger adsorption. In addition, the multiple polar functional groups of ARS enhance its interfacial interactions with the Zn surface through electrostatic interactions and charge redistribution, while the horizontal adsorption configuration further reduces steric hindrance. Conversely, for vertical adsorption, the interaction is mainly governed by localized coordination between sulfonic acid groups and the Zn surface. Therefore, SBS molecules with smaller steric hindrance exhibit relatively stronger adsorption in this configuration. The charge density difference in Supplementary Figures 10 and 11 verify the strong interactions between these molecules and the Zn (002) surface, showing more pronounced interfacial charge redistribution than that induced by H₂O adsorption^[46]. Meanwhile, owing to its multiple polar groups, ARS induces stronger interfacial charge redistribution with the Zn (002) surface than PHS and SBS. These results confirm that ARS, PHS, and SBS additive molecules can construct molecular adsorption layers with different adsorption strengths on the anode surface. Among them, ARS exhibits the strongest adsorption capability in the horizontal adsorption configuration due to the synergistic effect of its extended π-conjugated framework and multiple functional groups, which enables effective regulation of Zn²⁺ deposition behavior and HER kinetics at the Zn electrode interface.

In addition to the preliminary theoretical evaluation, the OCPs of Zn electrodes in different electrolytes were measured to provide experimental evidence for the adsorption of additive molecules on the Zn surface. As shown in Figure 2B, the OCP of the Zn electrode in the ZnSO₄ electrolyte initially decreases due to Zn dissolution and then gradually recovers as the Zn²⁺ concentration at the Zn electrode interface reaches equilibrium^[47]. However, the OCPs of the Zn electrodes in the ZnSO₄-containing ARS, PHS, and SBS electrolytes show positive shifts, which are attributed to the special adsorption of these molecules on the Zn surface. The EDL capacitance of the Zn electrode in different electrolytes was measured to elucidate the effect of interfacial molecular adsorption on the EDL characteristics, as illustrated in Figure 2C and Supplementary Figure 12. The EDL capacitance of the Zn electrode in ZnSO₄ solutions is about 245 μF cm^-2. After introducing ARS, PHS, and SBS additives into the ZnSO₄ solutions, this value decreases to 23 μF cm^-2, 74 μF cm^-2, and 87 μF cm^-2, respectively. According to the capacitance equation, the capacitance is inversely proportional to the thickness of the EDL. The reduced differential capacitance observed in Supplementary Figure 13 is consistent with this conclusion^[15]. These findings verify the adsorption of ARS, PHS, and SBS on the Zn anode, thereby modifying the EDL structure and regulating the interfacial properties of the Zn electrode.

The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) characteristics were analyzed to gain insight into the electronic interactions between the molecules and the Zn surface. The tendency of a molecule to donate or accept electrons can be inferred from its HOMO and LUMO energy levels, respectively. The order of HOMO energy levels of ARS, PHS, SBS, and H₂O molecules is H₂O < ARS < SBS < PHS [Figure 2D]. This indicates that these molecular additives preferentially donate electrons to the Zn surface compared with adsorbed H₂O molecules^[48]. The energy levels are consistent with the adsorption energy results mentioned above. The ARS molecules have the lowest LUMO energy level, meaning that the ARS molecules are very susceptible to accepting electrons from the Zn anode. This facilitates the preferential reduction of ARS, thereby suppressing the HER^[49,50]. Moreover, results show that the orbital energy gap (ΔE = E_LUMO - E_HOMO) of these molecules in descending order is: H₂O (6.99 eV) > SBS (2.99 eV) > PHS (2.90 eV) > ARS (1.58 eV). The value of ΔE reflects the chemical reactivity of the molecule. ARS molecules exhibit the lowest ΔE, suggesting they are readily reduced on the Zn surface, thereby forming an SEI that regulates Zn²⁺ deposition and protects the Zn anode from corrosion^[49,51]. Compared with PHS and SBS molecules, the ARS molecule contains multiple electronegative O atoms, which withdraw electron density from the aromatic rings, thus decreasing their π-electron density and making them susceptible to electrochemical reduction. The carbonyl (C=O) groups of ARS are proposed to undergo electrochemical reduction, likely forming hydroxylated aromatic species through the consumption of surface-adsorbed hydrogen intermediates, thereby suppressing HER and promoting the formation of a dense and uniform SEI^[52]. In addition, the minimal pH variation in Supplementary Figure 14 indicates that the ARS additive effectively mitigates local pH fluctuations at the Zn/electrolyte interface. Figure 2E shows that the resistance of HER increased after the addition of ARS, PHS, and SBS, indicating suppressed HER^[53]. This conclusion is further supported by the corrosion curves in Figure 2F. To be specific, the Zn electrode in the ZnSO₄ electrolyte has a corrosion current of 1.78 mA cm^-2 and a negative corrosion potential of -0.952 V. After adding ARS, PHS, and SBS, the corrosion potential shows a positive shift and the corrosion current density shows a decrease, implying the positive effect of additives on anti-corrosion performance^[15]. Notably, upon the addition of ARS to the electrolyte, the corrosion current decreases to 0.708 mA cm^-2, while the corrosion potential shifts positively to -0.947 V. These changes may be attributed to the electrochemical reduction of ARS molecules. CV curves in Supplementary Figure 15 show that there is a reduction peak at -0.7 V in the ARS electrolytes. The reduction species on the electrode were investigated by TEM [Figure 2G-K]. Results show that the lattice fringes of ZnCO₃ (104), ZnS (111), ZnO (100), and ZnCO₃ (116) are present on the Zn electrode cycled in ZnSO₄ with ARS electrolytes^[50,54], indicating the formation of an inorganic-rich SEI layer, which is composed of ZnCO₃, ZnS, and ZnO. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental maps in Figure 2L show that the elemental distributions of C, S, O, and Zn on the Zn electrode surface are uniform. Sparse crystalline domains are discernible on the Zn surface after cycling in the pristine ZnSO₄ electrolyte [Supplementary Figures 16 and 17], although its EDX elemental maps resemble those obtained in the presence of ARS. Upon introducing ARS, substantially more lattice fringes appear across the cycled Zn surface, indicative of enhanced interfacial product formation. These microscopic features support the formation of a compact and continuous inorganic-rich SEI induced by the ARS additive.

To identify the chemical composition of the species on the Zn anode cycled in ZnSO₄ and ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolytes, XPS coupled with Ar⁺ sputtering was applied. The variation of O, S, and C elements with sputtering time is depicted in Figure 3A and B. Deconvolution of the O 1s spectrum yields three components centered at 529.9, 531.6, and 533.6 eV, corresponding to Zn-O, C=O/S=O, and C-O/O-H species, respectively^[16,55]. With increasing Ar⁺ sputtering time, the peak at 529.9 eV gradually increases, whereas the peak at 533.6 eV gradually disappears. The enhanced Zn-O signal indicates the presence of ZnO on the Zn electrode, which is attributed to the decomposition of Zn₄SO₄(OH)₆·5H₂O generated during the parasitic corrosion reactions between dissolved oxygen/water and Zn^[56]. In the S 2p spectra, the peak at 169.1 eV is assigned to SO₄^2-[57,58]. With increasing Ar⁺ sputtering time, the characteristic ZnS peak at 162.0 eV gradually emerges for the Zn electrode cycled in the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte, whereas no corresponding Zn-S signal is detected for the Zn electrode cycled in the ZnSO₄ electrolyte. The findings suggest that the adsorbed ARS additives undergo electrochemical reduction at the anode interface, leading to the formation of ZnS species within the SEI. The C 1s spectrum comprises contributions from C-H/C-C (284.8 eV), C-O (286.4 eV), and ZnCO₃ (288.9 eV), with the latter likely originating from reactions involving dissolved CO₂ and decomposition products of organic molecules^[29,55]. For the Zn electrode cycled in ZnSO₄ electrolyte, prolonged Ar⁺ sputtering eliminates the C-O-C signal and progressively weakens the ZnCO₃ component [Figure 3A]. In contrast, the signal intensity of ZnCO₃ increases obviously, indicating rich ZnCO₃ on the Zn electrode [Figure 3B]. The results show that the addition of ARS facilitates the formation of a uniform inorganic-rich SEI composed of ZnO, ZnS, ZnCO₃ on the zinc electrode surface, in good agreement with the TEM observations. This robust interphase effectively inhibits Zn corrosion while promoting homogeneous Zn deposition^[50].

The chronoamperometry (CA) method was further applied to investigate the Zn nucleation and growth behavior. A lower steady-state current density indicates a more uniform and compact Zn deposition process, thereby suppressing dendrite formation^[59]. Figure 3C demonstrates that the current density in the ZnSO₄ electrolytes increases continuously for 200 s until 25 mA cm^-2. The current density during Zn deposition in ZnSO₄ electrolytes containing ARS, PHS, or SBS increases rapidly to about 17 mA cm^-2 within 100 s and remains stable thereafter. The rapid increase in current means the 3D diffusion process, while the slow increase in current means the 2D diffusion process^[46]. The former results in uniform and dense Zn deposition, while the latter results in irregular and sparse Zn deposition. Figure 3D shows an increased Zn nucleation overpotential after the introduction of ARS, PHS, and SBS additives, meaning that these additives promote the formation of smaller Zn nuclei and refined Zn deposition, which results in a more uniform Zn plating/stripping process and highly reversible Zn anodes^[60].

In situ optical microscopy was used to track the dynamic Zn deposition process at the electrode interface. After 20 min of plating, pronounced uneven Zn accumulation can be observed on the electrode surface [Supplementary Figure 18], indicating highly nonuniform Zn growth. However, Zn electrodes cycled in ZnSO₄ electrolytes containing ARS, PHS, or SBS exhibited smooth surfaces without obvious surface protrusions. The SEM results are consistent with this [Figure 3E]. Haphazard accumulation of large-sized flake deposits can be observed on the surface of Zn cycled in ZnSO₄ electrolytes. Due to the presence of ARS additives, the deposits on the Zn electrode are dense and uniform. For the Zn electrode cycled in the PHS-containing electrolyte, relatively uniform deposits are observed, although their particle size is considerably larger. Cycling in the presence of SBS leads to the formation of a porous and noncompact deposit on the Zn surface. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) profile of Zn retrieved from the additive-free ZnSO₄ electrolyte contains distinct reflections at 15°, 16°, 24°, and 31.5°, which are characteristic of Zn₄SO₄(OH)₆·5H₂O (JCPDS No. 39-0688) and ZnSO₃·2.5H₂O (JCPDS No. 42-0097) [Supplementary Figure 19]. Comparable by-product-related peaks are likewise present in the PHS-containing system. However, after introducing ARS and SBS into the electrolyte, the characteristic diffraction peaks of the by-products at 15° and 31.5° are no longer observed, and the intensities of the remaining diffraction peaks are substantially reduced. Taken together, these observations reveal highly nonuniform Zn deposition in the pristine ZnSO₄ electrolyte, characterized by pronounced surface irregularities and a heterogeneous deposit layer. However, owing to the interfacial regulation induced by the ARS, PHS, and SBS additives, Zn electrodes cycled in the corresponding additive-containing electrolytes exhibit smoother and more uniform Zn deposits. Among them, the ARS-containing electrolyte enables the formation of the densest and most homogeneous Zn deposition layer with minimal by-product formation.

Based on the above theoretical calculations and experimental results, the mechanism of ARS additives for Zn anodic protection is suggested. In the ZnSO₄ electrolyte [Figure 3F], the Zn anode suffers from severe parasitic corrosion and hydrogen evolution, together with uncontrolled Zn dendritic growth, resulting in rapid deterioration of cycling performance. Upon introducing ARS into the electrolyte [Figure 3G], the preferential adsorption of ARS on the Zn anode surface displaces interfacial H₂O molecules, creating a water-deficient interfacial environment. The C=O groups on the aromatic backbone of ARS preferentially react with surface-adsorbed hydrogen intermediates, thereby suppressing local alkalization caused by the HER. Subsequently, the adsorbed ARS molecules undergo electrochemical reduction to form a robust protective SEI. More importantly, due to the extended π-conjugated framework with highly delocalized π electrons, ARS acts as an electron-buffering layer that homogenizes the interfacial electron distribution on the Zn surface, thereby promoting uniform Zn deposition. Collectively, the introduction of ARS additives changes the Zn electrode interface by suppressing HER and Zn corrosion, facilitating reversible Zn deposition/stripping, and ultimately enhancing the cycling stability of the Zn anode.

To access the effect on the cycling performance of Zn anodes, Zn//Zn cells using ZnSO₄ electrolytes with and without ARS, PHS, and SBS additives were tested at different current densities. Figure 4A shows that the Zn//Zn cell using the ZnSO₄ electrolyte experiences a sudden short circuit after 260 h of cycling at 1 mA cm^-2 and 0.5 mAh cm^-2. With the introduction of additives, these cells can operate for more than 1,800 h. In particular, the Zn//Zn cell using the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte exhibits stable cycling for over 2,700 h. At 2 mA cm^-2 with the capacity of 1 mAh cm^-2, the cell using ZnSO₄ electrolytes shorts after 400 h of cycling, while the cell using ZnSO₄ with ARS, PHS, and SBS electrolytes can run for 2,000 h, 1,250 h, and 1,000 h, respectively [Figure 4B]. At 4 mAcm^-2 with the capacity of 1 mAh cm^-2, the cell using ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolytes can cycle 1,800 h [Figure 4C]. At a high current density of 10 mA cm^-2 with the capacity of 10 mAh cm^-2, the cell with additives can also operate 230 h, longer than the cell with ZnSO₄ electrolytes (60 h) [Supplementary Figure 20]. In Figure 4D, the rate performance of Zn//Zn cells with the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte shows favorable cycling stability under various current densities. Taken together, the Zn//Zn symmetric cells employing the ARS-containing electrolyte exhibit stable cycling over a wide range of current densities, demonstrating the robustness of the interfacial regulation effect under different operating conditions.

Zn plating/stripping reversibility was examined using Ti//Zn cells. The incorporation of ARS leads to a pronounced enhancement in Coulombic efficiency (CE), with an average value of 99.5% retained over 500 cycles [Figure 4E]. Without ARS, however, the average CE decreases to approximately 95%, and the cell survives for only 70 cycles, highlighting the beneficial role of ARS in stabilizing reversible Zn deposition. The reproducibility of the CE measurements was verified using three independently assembled Ti//Zn cells. The corresponding CE profiles and statistical analysis (99.46 ± 0.08, n = 3) are presented in Supplementary Figure 21, confirming the excellent reproducibility of the electrochemical performance. The initial CE of the Ti//Zn cell using ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolytes is 95.05%, higher than that of the cell using ZnSO₄ electrolytes (90.02%) [Figure 4F], indicating that the irreversible loss of the former cell is smaller than that of the latter cell^[61]. Conclusively, the excellent cycling stability of cells using ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolytes is associated with the formation of a suitable adsorption layer in the EDL structure and the inorganic-rich SEI protective layer on the Zn anode surface, which can modify the operating environment of the Zn anode.

The significantly prolonged cycling lifespan of symmetric cells demonstrates the effectiveness of the electrolyte additives in suppressing Zn dendrite growth and the HER. To further verify the beneficial effect of the ARS additive in practical devices, Zn//I₂ full batteries were assembled. As shown in Figure 5A, introducing ARS additives into the ZnSO₄ electrolyte decreases the redox potential difference and increases the redox peak currents, indicating reduced electrochemical polarization and improved electrochemical reversibility. The EIS spectra in Figure 5B show that both the charge transfer resistance and interfacial resistance decrease upon the addition of ARS to the ZnSO₄ electrolyte, indicating accelerated interfacial charge transfer kinetics due to interfacial regulation induced by ARS adsorption.

The galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of Zn//I₂ batteries containing the ZnSO₄ electrolyte [Supplementary Figure 22] and the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte [Figure 5C] were collected over a wide range of current densities from 0.1 to 4.0 A g^-1. Their corresponding rate performance are presented in Figure 5D. Distinct voltage plateaus centered at approximately 1.3 V during charging and 1.2 V during discharging are retained across these profiles, in good agreement with the redox features identified by CV. Compared with the battery using the ZnSO₄ electrolyte, the battery using ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte presents higher specific capacity and better rate performance. At 0.2 A g^-1, it shows a capacity of 192 mAh g^-1 over 1,200 cycles with CE and capacity retention of 99.8% and 93%, respectively [Figure 5E]. The battery without ARS provides 174 mAh g^-1 under the same conditions, with its CE and capacity retention reaching 99.5% and 87%, respectively. The beneficial effect of ARS becomes particularly evident during extended cycling at 1.0 A g^-1. Even beyond 7,000 cycles, a capacity of 170 mAh g^-1 is still accessible for the ARS-containing battery, substantially exceeding the 110 mAh g^-1 obtained with the pristine ZnSO₄ electrolyte [Figure 5F]. These results indicate that the stability of the Zn//I₂ full battery is enhanced over a wide range of current densities due to the improved interfacial regulation of the Zn anode by the ARS additives, highlighting its potential for practical applications.

In this work, ARS organic molecules, featuring an extended π-conjugated framework and multiple functional groups (sulfonic acid, hydroxyl, and carbonyl groups), were employed as an electrolyte additive to regulate the Zn anode/electrolyte interface in AZIBs. Comparative investigations using PHS and SBS as reference additives revealed that the synergistic effect of the extended π-conjugated framework and multiple functional groups is crucial for effective interfacial regulation and stable Zn deposition. Combined experimental and theoretical investigations demonstrate that ARS adsorption homogenizes the local interfacial electron distribution, regulates the Zn²⁺ flux, suppresses parasitic side reactions, and promotes the in situ formation of dense inorganic-rich SEI, thereby enabling uniform Zn deposition and highly reversible Zn plating/stripping. Consequently, Zn//Zn cells with the ZnSO₄ + ARS electrolyte exhibit stable cycling for more than 2,700 h at 1 mA cm^-2 (0.5 mAh cm^-2) and 2,000 h at 2 mA cm^-2 (1 mAh cm^-2), exceeding the cells with ZnSO₄, ZnSO₄ + PHS, and ZnSO₄ + SBS electrolytes. The incorporation of ARS enables the Zn//I₂ full battery to achieve robust long-term cycling and favorable rate performance. This work provides a rational molecular design strategy for electrolyte additives by integrating an extended π-conjugated framework with multiple functional groups, offering new insights into interfacial regulation of Zn anodes for high-performance AZIBs.