<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.oaepress.com/rdodj">
    <title>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</title>
    <description>Latest open access articles published in Cancers at https://www.oaepress.com/rdodj</description>
    <link>https://www.oaepress.com/rdodj</link>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="https://www.oaepress.com/rdodj"/>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:editorialoffice@rdodjournal.com"/>
    <dc:publisher>OAE Publishing Inc.</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY)</dc:rights>
    <prism:copyright>OAE Publishing Inc.</prism:copyright>
    <prism:rightsAgent>editorialoffice@rdodjournal.com</prism:rightsAgent>
    <image rdf:resource="https://i.oaes.cc/upload/journal_logo/rdodj.jpg"/>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.35"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.58"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2026.02"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.66"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.52"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.45"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.69"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.08"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.26"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.11"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.35">
    <title>Commentary on: ribozyme-activated RNA trans-ligation: an emerging strategy for large gene delivery in muscular dystrophies</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.35</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Gene therapies for muscular dystrophies are limited by the large size of disease-associated genes, which exceed the packaging capacity of standard adeno-associated virus vectors. In a recent &lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt; article, Lindley &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. introduced “StitchR”, a ribozyme-activated RNA trans-ligation platform designed to reconstitute full-length transcripts inside cells, thereby enabling expression of large therapeutic proteins. This commentary evaluates the StitchR platform in the context of existing dual-vector strategies, particularly split-intein systems that have advanced to human clinical trials. We review the mechanistic distinctions, comparative efficiency, and translational readiness of RNA versus protein-level reconstitution, and highlight key unknowns related to immunogenicity, efficiency, and fidelity. While StitchR represents a conceptually elegant and potentially transformative approach, its therapeutic relevance will depend on further validation in additional preclinical studies, regulatory engagement, and head-to-head comparisons with clinically advanced platforms.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1773360000</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Commentary on: ribozyme-activated RNA trans-ligation: an emerging strategy for large gene delivery in muscular dystrophies</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.35">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.35</a></p><p>Authors: Martin K. Childers,Hui-Chong Lau,Hichem Tasfaout</p><p><p>Gene therapies for muscular dystrophies are limited by the large size of disease-associated genes, which exceed the packaging capacity of standard adeno-associated virus vectors. In a recent <i>Science</i> article, Lindley <i>et al</i>. introduced “StitchR”, a ribozyme-activated RNA trans-ligation platform designed to reconstitute full-length transcripts inside cells, thereby enabling expression of large therapeutic proteins. This commentary evaluates the StitchR platform in the context of existing dual-vector strategies, particularly split-intein systems that have advanced to human clinical trials. We review the mechanistic distinctions, comparative efficiency, and translational readiness of RNA versus protein-level reconstitution, and highlight key unknowns related to immunogenicity, efficiency, and fidelity. While StitchR represents a conceptually elegant and potentially transformative approach, its therapeutic relevance will depend on further validation in additional preclinical studies, regulatory engagement, and head-to-head comparisons with clinically advanced platforms.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Commentary on: ribozyme-activated RNA trans-ligation: an emerging strategy for large gene delivery in muscular dystrophies</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Martin K. Childers</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hui-Chong Lau</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hichem Tasfaout</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.35</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1773360000</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1773360000</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.35</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.35</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.58">
    <title>Commentary on gait analysis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: integrating contracture, strength, and kinematic perspectives</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.58</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Walking ability in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) deteriorates progressively until complete loss of function. Interventions aimed at maintaining ambulatory ability rely on accurate clinical-based scores and evaluations of walking. The commentary concerns a study that provides a comprehensive look at how contractures, muscle weakness, and gait deviations intertwine to shape mobility in boys with DMD. The described eight-year longitudinal work offers a significant contribution to the understanding of longitudinal gait changes in DMD and the clinical value of such longitudinal data. The findings confirm that gait spatiotemporal parameters, particularly speed, stride length, and cadence, serve as sensitive markers of disease progression, closely linked to specific biomechanical impairments. The study strongly suggests that the integration of quantitative gait metrics into both clinical and research frameworks will be essential for optimizing patient monitoring and evaluating emerging therapeutics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1773273600</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Commentary on gait analysis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: integrating contracture, strength, and kinematic perspectives</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.58">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.58</a></p><p>Authors: Daniel Scherman</p><p><p>Walking ability in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) deteriorates progressively until complete loss of function. Interventions aimed at maintaining ambulatory ability rely on accurate clinical-based scores and evaluations of walking. The commentary concerns a study that provides a comprehensive look at how contractures, muscle weakness, and gait deviations intertwine to shape mobility in boys with DMD. The described eight-year longitudinal work offers a significant contribution to the understanding of longitudinal gait changes in DMD and the clinical value of such longitudinal data. The findings confirm that gait spatiotemporal parameters, particularly speed, stride length, and cadence, serve as sensitive markers of disease progression, closely linked to specific biomechanical impairments. The study strongly suggests that the integration of quantitative gait metrics into both clinical and research frameworks will be essential for optimizing patient monitoring and evaluating emerging therapeutics.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Commentary on gait analysis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: integrating contracture, strength, and kinematic perspectives</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Scherman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.58</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1773273600</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1773273600</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.58</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.58</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2026.02">
    <title>The critical importance of recognizing Gaucher disease in the fifth decade and beyond</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2026.02</link>
    <description/>
    <pubDate>1772755200</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The critical importance of recognizing Gaucher disease in the fifth decade and beyond</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2026.02">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2026.02</a></p><p>Authors: Daniel Scherman</p><p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>The critical importance of recognizing Gaucher disease in the fifth decade and beyond</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Scherman</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2026.02</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1772755200</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1772755200</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2026.02</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2026.02</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.66">
    <title>Adeno-associated viral vector gene therapy for canine hemophilia</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.66</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Hemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) are monogenic X-linked disorders caused by plasma coagulant factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) deficiency, respectively, and occur naturally in a variety of dog breeds. While several animal models of hemophilia exist, the canine model closely mimics the genotypic, phenotypic, and immunologic characteristics of the disorder in humans. Consequently, decades of research were conducted in the canine model of hemophilia, ultimately leading to licensed liver-directed adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated gene therapy for HA and HB in humans. The studies from both research colony and companion hemophilic dogs with AAV liver-directed gene therapy support the safety and efficacy of this platform in canines. Here, we provide practical considerations with respect to the administration and monitoring of liver-directed AAV gene therapy for hemophilia in veterinary clinical practice and review the data on efficacy and safety of AAV gene therapy in canine hemophilia.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1772496000</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Adeno-associated viral vector gene therapy for canine hemophilia</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.66">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.66</a></p><p>Authors: Bhavya S. Doshi,Julie M. Crudele,Mary Beth Callan</p><p><p>Hemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) are monogenic X-linked disorders caused by plasma coagulant factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX) deficiency, respectively, and occur naturally in a variety of dog breeds. While several animal models of hemophilia exist, the canine model closely mimics the genotypic, phenotypic, and immunologic characteristics of the disorder in humans. Consequently, decades of research were conducted in the canine model of hemophilia, ultimately leading to licensed liver-directed adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated gene therapy for HA and HB in humans. The studies from both research colony and companion hemophilic dogs with AAV liver-directed gene therapy support the safety and efficacy of this platform in canines. Here, we provide practical considerations with respect to the administration and monitoring of liver-directed AAV gene therapy for hemophilia in veterinary clinical practice and review the data on efficacy and safety of AAV gene therapy in canine hemophilia.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Adeno-associated viral vector gene therapy for canine hemophilia</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Bhavya S. Doshi</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Julie M. Crudele</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mary Beth Callan</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.66</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1772496000</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1772496000</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Review</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.66</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.66</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.52">
    <title>Plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1: current and emergent therapeutic strategies</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.52</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas cause significant morbidity and carry a risk of malignant transformation. Early targeted agents failed to demonstrate efficacy, safety, or durable responses until the discovery of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK 1/2) inhibitors. Selumetinib and mirdametinib are approved medical therapies that can potentially reduce tumor volume and symptoms, improve patient-reported outcomes, and have manageable toxicities. An indirect comparison between selumetinib and mirdametinib suggests differences in efficacy and safety, but direct confirmatory head-to-head trials are needed. Active clinical trials in the pipeline are exploring other targets in the MEK pathway, along with combination therapies. Key priorities include the impact of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor risk, defining long-term safety, durability off therapy, predictors of response and resistance, and implementation of multidisciplinary care.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1772409600</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1: current and emergent therapeutic strategies</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.52">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.52</a></p><p>Authors: Hannah Kim,Julia Polen,Gurcharanjeet Kaur</p><p><p>Neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas cause significant morbidity and carry a risk of malignant transformation. Early targeted agents failed to demonstrate efficacy, safety, or durable responses until the discovery of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK 1/2) inhibitors. Selumetinib and mirdametinib are approved medical therapies that can potentially reduce tumor volume and symptoms, improve patient-reported outcomes, and have manageable toxicities. An indirect comparison between selumetinib and mirdametinib suggests differences in efficacy and safety, but direct confirmatory head-to-head trials are needed. Active clinical trials in the pipeline are exploring other targets in the MEK pathway, along with combination therapies. Key priorities include the impact of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor risk, defining long-term safety, durability off therapy, predictors of response and resistance, and implementation of multidisciplinary care.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Plexiform neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1: current and emergent therapeutic strategies</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Hannah Kim</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Julia Polen</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gurcharanjeet Kaur</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.52</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1772409600</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1772409600</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.52</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.52</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.45">
    <title>Emerging treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.45</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;It is well known that the failure of multiple past clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is partly due to the clinical and immunological heterogeneity of the disease. Appropriate trial designs, endpoints, and patient populations are required to assess the efficacy of SLE treatments. At the same time, interdisciplinary research is gradually revealing multiple targets that contribute to the pathophysiology of SLE. Currently, molecular-targeted therapies tailored to the disease are being developed as treatment strategies that do not rely on glucocorticoids. With the introduction of new treatments and technologies, clinical trials for SLE have significantly accelerated over the past decade. More than 300 interventional studies on SLE and lupus nephritis, both ongoing and planned, are underway. Various trials targeting different pathways are currently being conducted and SLE treatment strategies may be on the verge of a turning point in the near future. However, some challenges remain. In this review, we focus on promising agents in phase 2 clinical trials and beyond to highlight the latest perspectives and unresolved issues related to targeted therapies for SLE, as well as to explore future research directions and therapeutic strategies required for the implementation of personalized medicine for this rare disease.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1772236800</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Emerging treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.45">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.45</a></p><p>Authors: Yurie Satoh-Kanda,Shingo Nakayamada,Yoshiya Tanaka</p><p><p>It is well known that the failure of multiple past clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is partly due to the clinical and immunological heterogeneity of the disease. Appropriate trial designs, endpoints, and patient populations are required to assess the efficacy of SLE treatments. At the same time, interdisciplinary research is gradually revealing multiple targets that contribute to the pathophysiology of SLE. Currently, molecular-targeted therapies tailored to the disease are being developed as treatment strategies that do not rely on glucocorticoids. With the introduction of new treatments and technologies, clinical trials for SLE have significantly accelerated over the past decade. More than 300 interventional studies on SLE and lupus nephritis, both ongoing and planned, are underway. Various trials targeting different pathways are currently being conducted and SLE treatment strategies may be on the verge of a turning point in the near future. However, some challenges remain. In this review, we focus on promising agents in phase 2 clinical trials and beyond to highlight the latest perspectives and unresolved issues related to targeted therapies for SLE, as well as to explore future research directions and therapeutic strategies required for the implementation of personalized medicine for this rare disease.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Emerging treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Yurie Satoh-Kanda</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Shingo Nakayamada</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Yoshiya Tanaka</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.45</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1772236800</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1772236800</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Review</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.45</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.45</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.69">
    <title>Meeting Abstracts from the XVI International Collaboration on Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs (ICORD): Incentivizing Science and a Comprehensive Program for Rare Diseases</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.69</link>
    <description/>
    <pubDate>1770249600</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Meeting Abstracts from the XVI International Collaboration on Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs (ICORD): Incentivizing Science and a Comprehensive Program for Rare Diseases</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.69">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.69</a></p><p>Authors: Emilio J. A. Roldan,Rumen Stefanov,Cynthia J. Tifft,Pablo Andres Evelson,Manuel Posada,Silvia Lucangioli,Domenica Taruscio,Gabriela Berg,Patricia Sonia Demianczuk,Alberto Mantovani,Mireia del Toro,Micaela Tamar Calógero,Eva Bermejo-Sánchez,Bianca Raíces,Claudio Carta,Fabiana Estebenet,Ramaiah Muthyala,Luis Alejandro Barrera,Guadalupe Velia Pacciarini</p><p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Meeting Abstracts from the XVI International Collaboration on Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs (ICORD): Incentivizing Science and a Comprehensive Program for Rare Diseases</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Emilio J. A. Roldan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Rumen Stefanov</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Cynthia J. Tifft</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Pablo Andres Evelson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Manuel Posada</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Silvia Lucangioli</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Domenica Taruscio</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gabriela Berg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Patricia Sonia Demianczuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Alberto Mantovani</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mireia del Toro</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Micaela Tamar Calógero</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eva Bermejo-Sánchez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bianca Raíces</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Claudio Carta</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Fabiana Estebenet</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ramaiah Muthyala</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Luis Alejandro Barrera</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Guadalupe Velia Pacciarini</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.69</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1770249600</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1770249600</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Meeting Abstracts</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.69</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.69</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.08">
    <title>Management strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus using kinase inhibitors</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.08</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune disease that is undergoing a revolution in its treatment paradigm. Receptor kinases including Janus (JAK) kinases, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) are essential for signalling of many cytokines and receptors on immune cells. Suppression of these kinases changes the activation state of target cells, leading to inhibition of cytokine actions and effects such as autoantibody secretion. Therefore, therapeutic kinase inhibitors hold potential as treatments for SLE, but their efficacy and safety remain to be determined. Tyrosine kinase 2 and JAK inhibitors such as deucravacitinib and upadacitinib respectively have shown positive results in phase 2 trials, while further research into the JAK inhibitor baricitinib and BTK and SYK inhibitors has been less encouraging. This review summarises the current state of research on the use of kinase inhibitors in SLE.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1768867200</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Management strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus using kinase inhibitors</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.08">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.08</a></p><p>Authors: Katie Liao,Hwai Jien Lee,Eric F. Morand</p><p><p>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune disease that is undergoing a revolution in its treatment paradigm. Receptor kinases including Janus (JAK) kinases, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) are essential for signalling of many cytokines and receptors on immune cells. Suppression of these kinases changes the activation state of target cells, leading to inhibition of cytokine actions and effects such as autoantibody secretion. Therefore, therapeutic kinase inhibitors hold potential as treatments for SLE, but their efficacy and safety remain to be determined. Tyrosine kinase 2 and JAK inhibitors such as deucravacitinib and upadacitinib respectively have shown positive results in phase 2 trials, while further research into the JAK inhibitor baricitinib and BTK and SYK inhibitors has been less encouraging. This review summarises the current state of research on the use of kinase inhibitors in SLE.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Management strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus using kinase inhibitors</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Katie Liao</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hwai Jien Lee</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eric F. Morand</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.08</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1768867200</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1768867200</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Review</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.08</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.08</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.26">
    <title>Educating hematologists about Gaucher disease</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.26</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Gaucher Disease (GD) is a rare, non-malignant inherited lysosomal storage disorder with a strong hematological component. Although the disease is non-malignant, patients are at risk of developing future hematological malignancies. Hematologists are the largest specialty diagnosing the condition, but diagnosis is usually incidental, following investigation for unexplained splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, or anemia. Hematologists must be alert to the possibility of GD when patients present with unexplained moderate-to-severe splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, chronic anemia, and osteolytic bone disease. The major barriers to diagnosis are that the common presenting features of GD overlap with those of other common hematological conditions. As a result, GD education needs to be shifted from the spectrum of metabolic disorders into mainstream hematology, especially because fast and accurate diagnosis is important for both the individual patient and their wider family.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1767830400</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Educating hematologists about Gaucher disease</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.26">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.26</a></p><p>Authors: Colm Bradley</p><p><p>Gaucher Disease (GD) is a rare, non-malignant inherited lysosomal storage disorder with a strong hematological component. Although the disease is non-malignant, patients are at risk of developing future hematological malignancies. Hematologists are the largest specialty diagnosing the condition, but diagnosis is usually incidental, following investigation for unexplained splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, or anemia. Hematologists must be alert to the possibility of GD when patients present with unexplained moderate-to-severe splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, chronic anemia, and osteolytic bone disease. The major barriers to diagnosis are that the common presenting features of GD overlap with those of other common hematological conditions. As a result, GD education needs to be shifted from the spectrum of metabolic disorders into mainstream hematology, especially because fast and accurate diagnosis is important for both the individual patient and their wider family.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Educating hematologists about Gaucher disease</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Colm Bradley</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.26</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1767830400</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1767830400</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.26</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.26</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.11">
    <title>Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis: an update</title>
    <link>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.11</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis was first described in 1822. Although it is a different entity with a distinct presentation, it was initially confused with neurofibromatosis type 1 by our forefathers and continues to be confused by clinicians and patients today. Historically, physicians recognized that some patients presented earlier and had more severe phenotypes (Wishart versus Gardner). This has been better understood through genetic and molecular studies, which indicate that the differences are likely related to mosaicism rather than germline mutations. Recently, the nomenclature was changed to Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis, which is more appropriate. Diagnostic criteria have also been modified with the addition of genetic testing results. Treatment remains a conundrum. Historically, surgery has been the mainstay; however, it is risky for large tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, such as bevacizumab, have been helpful in reducing the size of acoustic schwannomas and have been shown to preserve hearing, along with alleviating other symptoms. However, the medication has clear toxicities, and patients frequently become dependent on treatment or even develop tumor resistance. Numerous trials are ongoing to investigate reduced dosing regimens of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and alternative molecular targets to determine whether the natural progression of the disease can be altered. Gene therapy is on the horizon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>1767744000</pubDate>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis: an update</b></p><p>Cancers <a href="https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.11">doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.11</a></p><p>Authors: Donita Lightner</p><p><p>Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis was first described in 1822. Although it is a different entity with a distinct presentation, it was initially confused with neurofibromatosis type 1 by our forefathers and continues to be confused by clinicians and patients today. Historically, physicians recognized that some patients presented earlier and had more severe phenotypes (Wishart versus Gardner). This has been better understood through genetic and molecular studies, which indicate that the differences are likely related to mosaicism rather than germline mutations. Recently, the nomenclature was changed to Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis, which is more appropriate. Diagnostic criteria have also been modified with the addition of genetic testing results. Treatment remains a conundrum. Historically, surgery has been the mainstay; however, it is risky for large tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, such as bevacizumab, have been helpful in reducing the size of acoustic schwannomas and have been shown to preserve hearing, along with alleviating other symptoms. However, the medication has clear toxicities, and patients frequently become dependent on treatment or even develop tumor resistance. Numerous trials are ongoing to investigate reduced dosing regimens of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and alternative molecular targets to determine whether the natural progression of the disease can be altered. Gene therapy is on the horizon.</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:title>Neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis: an update</dc:title>
    <dc:creator>Donita Lightner</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.11</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</dc:source>
    <dc:date>1767744000</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationName>Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:publicationDate>1767744000</prism:publicationDate>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:section>Review</prism:section>
    <prism:startingPage/>
    <prism:doi>10.20517/rdodj.2025.11</prism:doi>
    <prism:url>https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/rdodj.2025.11</prism:url>
    <cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
  </item>
  <cc:License rdf:about="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
    <cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
    <cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
  </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
